Subscriber acquisition vs retention: what’s cheaper for streaming platforms?

Picture this: your marketing team celebrates acquiring 10,000 new subscribers this month, but your analytics show 8,000 existing customers churned. You’re running faster just to keep up, spending increasingly more to replace the users you’re losing.

This is the nightmare scenario for many streaming platforms – losing money on subscriber acquisition while existing customers quietly cancel their subscriptions.
The industry reality is harsh: acquiring a new customer costs 5-7 times more than keeping an existing one. Yet most platforms still chase expensive customer acquisition campaigns while subscribers slip away through the back door.

What can you do when subscription fatigue is a real concern and consumers are becoming more discerning? What separates successful retention strategies from expensive acquisition campaigns?

This guide breaks down both approaches, explains why subscribers actually leave streaming platforms. We’ll compare the real costs using examples like Netflix’s financial data and explain when each approach makes sense for your platform’s growth strategy.

What is subscriber acquisition?

Subscriber acquisition is the process of converting potential viewers into paying customers for your streaming platform. It encompasses everything from initial marketing campaigns to the moment someone enters their payment details and starts their first subscription.

For streaming platforms, acquisition involves multiple touchpoints: social media advertising, content marketing, influencer partnerships, search engine optimisation, and often expensive partnerships with telecommunications providers or device manufacturers. The goal is simple – get people to sign up and start paying for your service.

The acquisition challenges

Skyrocketing acquisition costs

Customer acquisition costs have risen dramatically as the market matures. Netflix, for example, spends approximately $89 to acquire each new subscriber. Some streaming providers spend up to $200 per year on marketing to acquire a single client.

Intense competition for attention

Streaming platforms now compete not just with each other, but with social media, gaming, and countless other entertainment options for consumers’ time and money. Subscribers can easily trial multiple services, compare content libraries, and switch platforms with minimal friction.

The trial and abandonment problem

Even a successful acquisition doesn’t guarantee subscriber retention. Many platforms struggle with “free trial abuse” where users sign up for trials, consume specific content, then cancel before paying. This leaves streaming services potentially losing money on each acquisition attempt.

What is subscriber retention?

Subscriber retention refers to the ability to keep existing customers engaged and subscribed to your streaming platform over time, thereby preventing them from cancelling their subscriptions. It’s fundamentally different from acquiring new users – instead of convincing strangers to try your service, you’re maintaining relationships with people who’ve already chosen your platform.

For streaming platforms, this challenge is particularly complex because viewing habits are deeply personal and entertainment choices are increasingly competitive. Unlike business software that becomes embedded in daily workflows, streaming services must continuously prove their value through fresh content, seamless experiences, and personalised recommendations that keep viewers coming back for more.

Don’t just acquire subscribers – keep them

Check our solutions

Check our solutions

Why do subscribers leave streaming platforms?

Understanding why subscribers abandon streaming services reveals the true cost of poor retention strategies. Before diving into solutions, it’s crucial to understand that streaming platforms face two distinct types of SVOD churn:

• Voluntary churn occurs when subscribers actively decide to cancel their subscriptions – they consciously choose to leave due to dissatisfaction, better alternatives, or budget constraints.
• Involuntary churn occurs when subscriptions are terminated due to payment failures, expired cards, or billing errors. These customers often still want to use your service but lose access due to technical issues.
  Here are the main reasons why subscribers leave, ranging from conscious decisions to technical problems beyond their control.

Here are the main reasons why subscribers leave, ranging from conscious decisions to technical problems beyond their control.

Hit-and-run viewing and subscription rotation

The average household now juggles five different streaming subscriptions. According to Deloitte, 62% of users who cancelled had signed up specifically to watch one show, then left once they finished it. This “hit-and-run” behaviour has become endemic, with 43% cancelling the same day they decided they no longer wanted the service – leaving platforms with virtually no time to respond.

Poor content discovery and lack of personalisation

Many subscribers leave because they can’t find content that matches their interests. Platforms that fail to deliver relevant recommendations or have confusing navigation systems struggle to retain users’ engagement. Without proper personalisation, subscribers feel overwhelmed by endless scrolling through irrelevant content, leading to frustration and eventual cancellation.

Technical issues and poor user experience

Buffering problems, app crashes, inconsistent streaming quality, or platforms that don’t work seamlessly across devices quickly turn loyal customers into churn statistics. Subscribers expect flawless performance and have little patience for technical problems.

Competition from free alternatives

Subscribers increasingly abandon paid services when they discover content available on free platforms. The number citing “ability to access content on other free services” as a reason for cancellation has jumped to 23%. The growth of free ad-supported streaming services (AVOD) has provided consumers with viable alternatives to paid subscriptions, as many users find they can satisfy their viewing needs without incurring monthly fees.

Content gaps and production delays

Subscribers cancel when they’ve exhausted interesting content or when platforms fail to refresh their libraries regularly. Production delays – particularly during the pandemic – have made it harder for services to keep audiences engaged with fresh original content.

Payment failures

Involuntary churn from failed payments accounts for up to 7.2% of monthly subscriber loss for some platforms – subscribers lose access due to expired cards or billing errors, often without realising their subscription has lapsed.

Subscriber acquisition vs retention: the cost breakdown

The numbers reveal a stark reality about streaming economics. While customer acquisition requires significant upfront investment with uncertain returns, subscriber retention delivers predictable, compound value over time.

Netflix by the numbers: the retention advantage

Netflix’s growth trajectory tells a compelling story about retention-focused strategy. From 2023 to 2024, Netflix added 41.32 million subscribers, reaching 301.6 million global subscribers by July 2025.

Based on Netflix’s documented performance:

• Acquisition cost: $88.60 per subscriber
• First-year revenue: $182 per subscriber
• Customer retention rate: 98.2% – the highest in the industry
• Average subscription length: 4.6 years

The maths is compelling: assuming consistent revenue across the subscription lifecycle, each $88.60 acquisition investment generates approximately $837 in lifetime value – that’s nearly a 10x return on investment.

This retention-focused approach explains Netflix’s recent financial performance. In Q2 2025, Netflix generated $11.07 billion in revenue with $3.13 billion in net income, demonstrating how platforms that master subscriber retention can achieve both growth and profitability.

Acquisition vs retention: the strategic comparison

When deciding where to allocate your streaming platform’s budget, the choice between customer acquisition and subscriber retention becomes clearer when you compare them side by side. Here’s how both approaches stack up across key business metrics:

*Based on industry research showing retention costs 5-7x less than acquisition ($200 ÷ 5-7 = $29-40)

Choose your optimal subscriber strategy

The industry reality is clear: acquiring a new customer costs five to seven times more than retaining an existing one. Netflix’s success demonstrates that subscriber retention isn’t just cheaper – it’s the foundation of sustainable streaming business models.

Customer acquisition requires ongoing investment in advertising, partnerships, and promotional offers. On the other hand, Subscriber retention leverages existing relationships through personalised recommendations and seamless experiences – typically costing a fraction of acquisition expenses while delivering higher lifetime value.

The most successful streaming platforms don’t choose between acquisition and retention – they master both. They acquire the right subscribers who are likely to stay, then focus relentlessly on keeping them engaged through superior content discovery, flawless technical performance, and personalised experiences that make cancellation unthinkable.

Your next steps:

• Audit your current churn rate and identify the biggest reasons subscribers leave
• Implement strategies to reduce involuntary churn from payment failures – often the quickest win
• Invest in personalisation technology that helps users discover content they love
• Build flexible subscription options that prevent “hit-and-run” viewing behaviour

The streaming landscape will only become more competitive. Platforms that master subscriber retention today will have the sustainable revenue streams and loyal audiences needed to thrive tomorrow.

Ready to build a retention-first streaming strategy? Discover our services and learn how we can assist you in navigating the challenges of subscriber growth and engagement.

FAQ